Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial public version #1

Merged
merged 37 commits into from
Aug 17, 2020
Merged

Initial public version #1

merged 37 commits into from
Aug 17, 2020

Conversation

jesper-friis
Copy link
Collaborator

Initial public version of the crystallography domain ontology. The README file has been updated with Adham's table to reflect the status as a non-official EMMO domain ontology

jesper-friis and others added 30 commits April 3, 2020 08:14
dcterms:license.  They should be fixed in emmocheck.
…master'

Update readme according to marketplace template

See merge request ontology/domains/crystallography!1
… failures

+ added some debugging output to the before_script
Load local version of EMMO when running emmocheck in .gitlab-ci.yml

See merge request ontology/domains/crystallography!3
Improved annotations for species and constituent.

See merge request ontology/domains/crystallography!2
Copy link
Contributor

@CasperWA CasperWA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good to get in and iterate on if needed 👍
I've made a few minor comments, they're not crucial at all so will approve and let it be up to @jesper-friis what to do with the comments :)

Comment on lines +24 to +25
run: |
pip install EMMO
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need for the pipe (also below), or are you future-proofing for more lines? :)

Suggested change
run: |
pip install EMMO
run: pip install EMMO

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. It is just the syntax used in the templates by GitHub

Comment on lines +28 to +29
run: |
emmocheck --local --verbose --check-imported emmo.owl
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
run: |
emmocheck --local --verbose --check-imported emmo.owl
run: emmocheck --local --verbose --check-imported emmo.owl

Status
------
- [ ] Proposal
- [X] accepted, under development
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- [X] accepted, under development
- [X] Accepted, under development

------
- [ ] Proposal
- [X] accepted, under development
- [ ] official
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- [ ] official
- [ ] Official

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good points.

@francescalb
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good, took only a few minutes for reasoning in Protege

@emanueleghedini
Copy link
Member

I don't feel comfortable with a candidate EMMO domain ontology that depends on an EMMO version that is not part of the official repository.

We should implement in the EMMO official branches the EMMO-marketplace feature that this domain ontology needs.

The IRI http://emmo.info/emmo/marketplace-1.0.1 is not working, so the domain ontology has no top level foundation.

@jesper-friis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jesper-friis commented Jul 4, 2020 via email

@ahashibon ahashibon merged commit 6a83cca into master Aug 17, 2020
@ahashibon
Copy link
Contributor

I merging so we have all in the master!

@ahashibon ahashibon deleted the initial-public-version branch August 17, 2020 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants