Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve performance with parallelization #9

Open
ndsvw opened this issue Nov 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Improve performance with parallelization #9

ndsvw opened this issue Nov 28, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ndsvw
Copy link
Owner

ndsvw commented Nov 28, 2021

Some steps can probably be parallelized.

@ndsvw ndsvw added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 28, 2021
@ndsvw
Copy link
Owner Author

ndsvw commented Dec 4, 2021

Both shuffle algorithms can't be parallelized because the swapping has to happen on the whole array/list rather than on a part of it.

@ndsvw ndsvw changed the title Improve performance with parallelization Improve performance with parallelization <u>.</u> Apr 7, 2022
@ndsvw ndsvw changed the title Improve performance with parallelization <u>.</u> Improve performance with parallelization <script>alter(1)</script> Apr 7, 2022
@ndsvw ndsvw changed the title Improve performance with parallelization <script>alter(1)</script> Improve performance with parallelization <script>alert(1)</script> Apr 7, 2022
@ndsvw ndsvw changed the title Improve performance with parallelization <script>alert(1)</script> Improve performance with parallelization Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant