Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider removing genericName #59

Closed
alranel opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #146
Closed

Consider removing genericName #59

alranel opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 1 comment · Fixed by #146
Labels
standard-breaking-change This change breaks backward compatibility vote-draft Change proposal to the Standard or to the governance procedures

Comments

@alranel
Copy link
Contributor

alranel commented Apr 4, 2019

As of now, genericName is mandatory and limited to 35 characters.

However, field experience is showing that this field always contains information that is already carried by shortDescription, softwareType and categories. We should consider removing genericName if no good reason for it arises.

@alranel alranel added the meta Meta changes not related to the standard itself label Apr 4, 2019
@libremente libremente added the vote-draft Change proposal to the Standard or to the governance procedures label Jun 14, 2019
@bfabio
Copy link
Contributor

bfabio commented Jun 22, 2021

@bfabio bfabio added standard-breaking-change This change breaks backward compatibility and removed meta Meta changes not related to the standard itself labels Dec 5, 2021
bfabio added a commit to bfabio/publiccode.yml that referenced this issue Mar 28, 2022
genericName doesn't really fit software outside Desktop environments
and is often misused in practice. Also, we don't offer any controlled vocabulary
for generic names.

The 'shortDescription' and 'name' keys are good enough.

Fix publiccodeyml#59.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
standard-breaking-change This change breaks backward compatibility vote-draft Change proposal to the Standard or to the governance procedures
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants