Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TM1914 Chip Support #1606

Open
luminxa opened this issue Dec 31, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3913
Open

TM1914 Chip Support #1606

luminxa opened this issue Dec 31, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3913
Labels
enhancement fixed in source This issue is unsolved in the latest release but fixed in master

Comments

@luminxa
Copy link

luminxa commented Dec 31, 2020

I thought I ordered sk6812 but turns out its tm1914 chip.. any support for this? tried it with wled and not working when wrgb option clicked

@Def3nder
Copy link
Contributor

Def3nder commented Jan 5, 2021

Hi @luminxa,
I think you will be out-of-luck with this chipset as there is no support for the TM1914 in the FastLED library...
...no does the NeoPixel Brightness Bus library support this.

(the protocol seems to be "inverted" and not that easy to handle).

So you better order a SK6812 ...

@oraclesod
Copy link

Comparing the datasheet from the TM1814 and TM1914, they are very similar, both are inverted too... Different OUT PWM output frequencies and Propagation delay times...

Would anyone be able to make the changes to allow the TM1914 ? I've attached its datasheet, but im not very good at coding so not sure ill be able to do this myself :(

TM1914A_V1.1_EN.pdf

@blazoncek blazoncek linked a pull request Apr 17, 2024 that will close this issue
@blazoncek blazoncek added the fixed in source This issue is unsolved in the latest release but fixed in master label Apr 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement fixed in source This issue is unsolved in the latest release but fixed in master
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants