Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test(dot/parachain/backing): It's impossible to second multiple candidates per relay parent without prospective parachains. #4013

Open
Tracked by #4002
axaysagathiya opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@axaysagathiya
Copy link
Contributor

axaysagathiya commented Jun 6, 2024

Approach:

  • Send a Second message to the candidate backing subsystem. It should issue the Seconded statement and distribute it.
  • again, Send a Second message to the candidate backing subsystem with a different candidate hash and the same relay parent.
    • it should validate the candidate, but the candidate should get rejected because we have already seconded a candidate for the relay parent.
@axaysagathiya axaysagathiya changed the title Tests that it's impossible to second multiple candidates per relay parent without prospective parachains. testr(dot/parachain/backing): It's impossible to second multiple candidates per relay parent without prospective parachains. Jun 6, 2024
@axaysagathiya axaysagathiya changed the title testr(dot/parachain/backing): It's impossible to second multiple candidates per relay parent without prospective parachains. test(dot/parachain/backing): It's impossible to second multiple candidates per relay parent without prospective parachains. Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant