You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the documentation of different parts of the package has been written by different people, different notation has been used to refer to the same terms/concepts in several entries of the docs (e.g., UKI and EKI pages).
To provide a cleaner and more consistent documentation, we should unify notation across the docs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think it was a free parameter in an earlier version of the paper, which was later removed from the published version; see eq. (18) and below in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2022.111262. I would say let's delete kappa altogether, to have the docs resemble the paper.
Since the documentation of different parts of the package has been written by different people, different notation has been used to refer to the same terms/concepts in several entries of the docs (e.g., UKI and EKI pages).
To provide a cleaner and more consistent documentation, we should unify notation across the docs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: