Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testhost Diag log file name format change #303

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 24, 2016
Merged

Testhost Diag log file name format change #303

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 24, 2016

Conversation

smadala
Copy link
Contributor

@smadala smadala commented Dec 23, 2016

  • Change testhost diag log file name format, to avoid overwrite in parallel execution

@codito codito added this to the Preview 111.2 - 20161223 milestone Dec 24, 2016
@codito
Copy link
Contributor

codito commented Dec 24, 2016

👍

@codito codito merged commit 9a492ea into microsoft:master Dec 24, 2016
harshjain2 added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 27, 2016
* Allow TranslationLayer to specify Diag parameters
Log message for logging file of test host

* Passing runsettings as command line arguments.

* Removed unused variable.

* Added regex, testcases.

* Added new parameter VSTestCLIRunSettings in VSTest Task.

* Added htlm encoding to the RunSettings values coming as CLI arguments.

* Style fixes

* Fix typo

* Work done under this commit: (#302)

1) Create xlf file for all language
2) Create language resx file from xlf file
3) create satellite dll

* Testhost Diag log file name format change (#303)

Update diag log format for testhost. New format ensures log files are unique so that we don't run multiple testhosts with same file name in case of parallel runs.

* Changes for passing RunSettings args as array of string.

* Doc changes.

* test fixes.

* Removed unused namespaces, improved documentation, added trim to key.

* Removed HTML Encoding as it is already done while validating xml.

* Removed ununsed namespace and package.run
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants