We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reference: https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/blob/main/docs/source/blogs/quantization-in-TRT-LLM.md#performance
Model Batch Size Speedup (FP8 v.s. FP16) Speedup (INT8 SQ v.s. FP16) GPT-J 1 1.40x 1.40x GPT-J 8 1.44x 1.30x LLaMA-v2-7B 1 1.51x 1.47x LLaMA-v2-7B 8 1.40x 1.32x
my question is : why fp8 speedup is better than int8 smoothquant, fp8 and int8 tensor core TFLOPS is same on H100
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
int8 smoothquant has quant/dequant cost
Sorry, something went wrong.
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 15 days."
No branches or pull requests
reference: https://github.com/NVIDIA/TensorRT-LLM/blob/main/docs/source/blogs/quantization-in-TRT-LLM.md#performance
Model Batch Size Speedup (FP8 v.s. FP16) Speedup (INT8 SQ v.s. FP16)
GPT-J 1 1.40x 1.40x
GPT-J 8 1.44x 1.30x
LLaMA-v2-7B 1 1.51x 1.47x
LLaMA-v2-7B 8 1.40x 1.32x
my question is : why fp8 speedup is better than int8 smoothquant, fp8 and int8 tensor core TFLOPS is same on H100
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: