You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
which functionally have the same setup, and test the same functionality using different methods
It was proposed that it might be more readable / nicer to relate similar tracking results to each other in the results files
I am unsure if it would be better to keep a flat results structure and then add nicer summaries on top of that (which could easily aggregate related fields such as this), or if we do want the results files themselves to be more human-understandable at a glance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
CodyCBakerPhD
changed the title
Nest time_ and network_track_ and other <type>_ within results
[Proposal] Nest time_ and network_track_ and other <type>_ within results
Mar 11, 2024
Currently, in reference to a file like https://github.com/NeurodataWithoutBorders/nwb_benchmarks/blob/main/results/results_timestamp-2024-02-20-01-07-39_machine-e9c0f1370ec8dc3640d91c7d0f381a6d61bd9a46_environment-2d1c68a2c7de02ab2c200e448b250bee5e46f212.json
we have separate JSON entries per benchmarks like
network_tracking_remote_file_reading.FsspecNoCacheDirectFileReadBenchmark.track_network_activity_during_read
and
time_remote_slicing.FsspecNoCacheContinuousSliceBenchmark.time_slice
which functionally have the same setup, and test the same functionality using different methods
It was proposed that it might be more readable / nicer to relate similar tracking results to each other in the results files
I am unsure if it would be better to keep a flat results structure and then add nicer summaries on top of that (which could easily aggregate related fields such as this), or if we do want the results files themselves to be more human-understandable at a glance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: