Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

715 records in the PUF have n65>n21 #318

Closed
MaxGhenis opened this issue Jun 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Closed

715 records in the PUF have n65>n21 #318

MaxGhenis opened this issue Jun 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@MaxGhenis
Copy link
Contributor

Defining n65 as (age_head>64) + (age_spouse>64) + elderly_dependents, 715 records have n65>n21. All 715 have age_head>64, and they otherwise fall into 3 categories (notebook):

  1. 700 records have n21=1 and age_spouse>64, e.g. RECID 415.
  2. 13 records have n21=2, age_spouse>64, and elderly_dependents=1, e.g. RECID 6869.
  3. 2 records have n21=1, and elderly_dependents=1, e.g. RECID 13275.
@MaxGhenis
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think a way to avoid this is to impute n2164 separately from the CPS, then add it to a calculated n65 to produce n21.

@andersonfrailey
Copy link
Collaborator

I think that's a good idea, @MaxGhenis. I'm working on refactoring the statistical matching process now. I can work that in as I go.

@MaxGhenis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Was this addressed in recent updates?

@andersonfrailey
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaxGhenis, yep this has been resolved with the latest updates. Closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants