-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Close eyes situation #24
Comments
Maybe high regularization on the expression parameters. |
AFAIK the FLAME model does not have a blinking blendshape, so you may have to include custom shapes to get it to blink. |
FLAME in the public form has no dedicated blendshapes to add eyeblinks but by optimizing the expression parameters, FLAME is able to blink. Commonly, a too high regularization of the expression parameters prevent that as suggested by @wuneng. An alternative option is to use the additional eyeblink blenshapes that we share in the metrical-tracker repository. |
@Bornblack did you figure out how to do it? |
@TimoBolkart
Hi,
Thanks for your great work. The objective weights you provided can make the fitting result good most of the time. But when the eyes are closed, the eyes of the fitting result are open. Although I try to tune the weights and add the eye distance objective, the result is still eyes-open.
Here are the implementation of the eye distance objective.
Any help would be appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: