You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given the well-defined grammar a -> b+; b -> "x" ":" "x"+ ";"?, the parser will match valid input x:x;x:x but won't match also-valid input x:xx:x. This is because "x"+ greedily slurps up all the xs and the parser doesn't have any look-ahead to see whether an x has a : after it and should therefore be left to the next b to pick up.
This requires an LL(2) grammar, so we will probably have to bite the LL(k) or LL(*) bullet soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Given the well-defined grammar
a -> b+; b -> "x" ":" "x"+ ";"?
, the parser will match valid inputx:x;x:x
but won't match also-valid inputx:xx:x
. This is because"x"+
greedily slurps up all thex
s and the parser doesn't have any look-ahead to see whether anx
has a:
after it and should therefore be left to the nextb
to pick up.This requires an LL(2) grammar, so we will probably have to bite the LL(k) or LL(*) bullet soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: