Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

For Cycle 7 #398

Closed
wiz opened this issue Nov 10, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

For Cycle 7 #398

wiz opened this issue Nov 10, 2019 · 5 comments

Comments

@wiz
Copy link
Member

wiz commented Nov 10, 2019

Summary

BSQ requested: 9873 BSQ * 0.79 = 7800 USD

Contributions Delivered

Bisq [ 2543 BSQ ]

Bisq Infrastructure [ 5700 BSQ ]

Bisq Website [ 630 BSQ ]

Roles Performed

  • Bisq Seednode Maintainer (secondary) [ 125 BSQ ]
  • Bisq BTCNode Maintainer (secondary) [ 125 BSQ ]
  • Bisq Markets API Maintainer [ 125 BSQ ]
  • Bisq BTCNode Operator (x2) [ 250 BSQ ]
  • Bisq Pricenode Operator [ 125 BSQ ]
  • Bisq Analytics Operator [ 125 BSQ ]
  • Bisq Seednode Operator [ 125 BSQ ]
  • Bisq Twitter @BisqJP [ 0 BSQ ]
  • Bisq Keybase Admin [ 0 BSQ ]
@wiz
Copy link
Member Author

wiz commented Nov 11, 2019

9a42d9c4f73efec228dba1b44f406c97f9d877d9f9e53be9e1611b0dadd62f32

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

@wiz I think it is better to value the positions in BSQ instead of USD and convert it afterwards as it makes it harder to compare with all the other compensation requests in one cycle.

@ripcurlx
Copy link
Contributor

Bisq [ 2000 USD ]

  • Investigated Bisq wallet corruption issues, user support, etc.

Are there any issues that you want to point out for stakeholders, that were not aware of this problem and the resulting fixes in v1.2.3.

Bisq Infrastructure [ 5000 USD ]

  • Re-implemented Bisq Markets API using caching proxy

Please link the PR. I hope I'll be able to review ACK and merge it in time.

Bisq Website [ 500 USD ]

  • Tweaked website for new Markets API tweaks

Please link the PR. Thanks!

@wiz
Copy link
Member Author

wiz commented Nov 11, 2019

@wiz I think it is better to value the positions in BSQ instead of USD and convert it afterwards as it makes it harder to compare with all the other compensation requests in one cycle.

Okay, fixed

Are there any issues that you want to point out for stakeholders, that were not aware of this problem and the resulting fixes in v1.2.3.

I think @chimp1984 did the best summary write-up of the issues here bisq-network/proposals#132

Please link the PR. I hope I'll be able to review ACK and merge it in time.

I moved the PRs next to the line items. As long as we can merge the PR before voting begins should be okay 😅

@MwithM
Copy link
Contributor

MwithM commented Nov 24, 2019

Closed as accepted.

@MwithM MwithM closed this as completed Nov 24, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants