Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ATT&CK Technique auto-complete #60

Closed
OpalSec opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #95
Closed

Add ATT&CK Technique auto-complete #60

OpalSec opened this issue Jan 12, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by #95

Comments

@OpalSec
Copy link

OpalSec commented Jan 12, 2023

Adding auto-complete for the technique ID field of Action objects would help immensely, as it not only makes it easier to cite Techniques, but also ensures they're consistent and not subject to typos.

Being able to add multiple Techniques to a single Action object would also be helpful - though I understand if your view is that this isn't in keeping with the design intent of this project.

It would be useful for my particular use case, though. See below for an example:

image

In visualising a long and complex intrusion, breaking each Technique into its own Action object would result in a sprawling diagram that would be hard to navigate.

My preference is to use the Name field to describe distinct stages of the intrusion, elaborating in the Description field while also inserting the relevant Technique IDs. In doing so I can condense multi-staged attack paths into more compact diagrams, broken up by milestones in the intrusion.

@mehaase
Copy link
Contributor

mehaase commented Jan 30, 2023

Thank you for suggesting this. It is in our backlog and will be included in a release in the next 2 months.

@initstring
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mehaase ,

Thanks for your work on such a cool tool! I am also really interested in this feature. Is it still planned for release?

Thanks so much.

@mikecarenzo mikecarenzo linked a pull request Aug 18, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants