Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

mklittlefs support for 32 bit Linux is missing in version 2.6.0 and later #7202

Closed
1 task
andrews999 opened this issue Apr 9, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task

Comments

@andrews999
Copy link

Basic Infos

  • [ y] This issue complies with the issue POLICY doc.
  • [y ] I have read the documentation at readthedocs and the issue is not addressed there.
  • [y ] I have tested that the issue is present in current master branch (aka latest git).
  • [y ] I have searched the issue tracker for a similar issue.
  • If there is a stack dump, I have decoded it.
  • [y ] I have filled out all fields below.

Platform

  • Hardware: [ESP-12|ESP-01|ESP-07|ESP8285 device|other]
  • Core Version: [2.6.3]
  • Development Env: [Arduino IDE]
  • Operating System: [Linux 32 bit]

Settings in IDE

  • Module: [Generic ESP8266 Module|Wemos D1 mini r2|Nodemcu|other]
  • Flash Mode: [qio|dio|other]
  • Flash Size: [4MB/1MB]
  • lwip Variant: [v1.4|v2 Lower Memory|Higher Bandwidth]
  • Reset Method: [ck|nodemcu]
  • Flash Frequency: [40Mhz]
  • CPU Frequency: [80Mhz|160MHz]
  • Upload Using: [OTA|SERIAL]
  • Upload Speed: [115200|other] (serial upload only)

Problem Description

When mklittlefs was introduced in version 2.6.0 the lines to support 32 bit Linux were missing from package_esp8266com_index.json. They can be manually added in a local file as the files exist in https://github.com/earlephilhower/esp-quick-toolchain/releases/download/2.5.0-4/i686-linux-gnu.mklittlefs-7f77f2b.1563313032.tar.gz.
Can the build be changed to include support for 32 bit Linux?

@d-a-v
Copy link
Collaborator

d-a-v commented Apr 9, 2020

This has been fixed since 2.6.3, you need to wait for release 2.7.0 or use the beta (0.0.1) version.

@andrews999
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your help.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants