Whether there are plans to support FEC or mutipath

[nilins]

best wish
Whether there are plans to support FEC or mutipath

[kazuho]

We have an open PR that implements the draft version of multipath: #559.

Adoption of both features depend on how the standardization goes.

[nilins]

We have an open PR that implements the draft version of multipath: #559.

Adoption of both features depend on how the standardization goes.

---

thanks for your reply。

quickly is support quic v1。

but as follow RFC， which is support ？ which is not support？
RFC 9221 An Unreliable Datagram Extension to QUIC
RFC 9204 QPACK: Field Compression for HTTP/3
RFC 9114 HTTP/3
RFC 9368Compatible Version Negotiation for QUIC
RFC 9369 QUIC Version 2
RFC 9308 Applicability of the QUIC Transport Protocol
RFC 9312 Manageability of the QUIC Transport Protocol
RFC 9287 Greasing the QUIC Bit

[kazuho]

• 9221 is supported by quicly.
• 9204 and 9114 is not QUIC but rather HTTP/3, they are supported by h2o, not quicly.
• 9368, 9369, 9287 are not supported.
• 9308 and 9312 are not protocol definitions.