You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We should support at least 8-bits, 16-bits, 32-bits and 64-bits integers. A first step is probably to introduce a new integer type for each of the different sizes.
Warning: On x86-64, the different registers may overlap (eax and rax have the same low 32-bits, etc.).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
All is in the title.
We should support at least 8-bits, 16-bits, 32-bits and 64-bits integers. A first step is probably to introduce a new integer type for each of the different sizes.
Warning: On x86-64, the different registers may overlap (eax and rax have the same low 32-bits, etc.).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: