Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Ping GBIF to reinterpret EML for correct author order #129

Open
peterdesmet opened this issue Sep 28, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

Ping GBIF to reinterpret EML for correct author order #129

peterdesmet opened this issue Sep 28, 2016 · 6 comments
Assignees
@stijnvanhoey
Labels
all-datasets supposed-fixed

Comments

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member

See this issue. GBIF will now show the authors of a dataset in the correct order, but it needs to reinterpret the EML of dataset to do so.

We should contact the GBIF helpdesk to do this for all INBO datasets.
@stijnvanhoey
Copy link
Contributor

Mail sent to gbif helpdesk.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Did you get any response?

@stijnvanhoey
Copy link
Contributor

stijnvanhoey commented Apr 14, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Response:

All the datasets have been re-crawled. Can you please verify that the EML files were updated to your satisfaction.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

No, Peter's comment at http://dev.gbif.org/issues/browse/POR-523 is still unresolved: Koen Devos should be the first person for ORIGINATOR, METADATA AUTHOR and ADMINISTRATIVE CONTACT in http://www.gbif.org/dataset/7f9eb622-c036-44c6-8be9-5793eaa1fa1e. That is not the case.

@stijnvanhoey
Copy link
Contributor

GBIF helpdesk provided the following response:

We have fixed the issue on our side. This is a legacy bug and it will go away with the new portal release.

@peterdesmet
Copy link
Member Author

Nice, let's close when it is launched.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stijnvanhoey stijnvanhoey

Labels
all-datasets supposed-fixed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@peterdesmet @stijnvanhoey