Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request (cvOSCcv) - Multiple instances using the same IO port #27

Closed
Outboarder opened this issue Apr 28, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Comments

@Outboarder
Copy link

Outboarder commented Apr 28, 2018

Hi Jason.
I'm using this fabulous module (cvOSCcv) and so far enjoying it.
The only thing that I wish it had is support for using the same IO port in other instances ,this will helps to extend the number of IO's on the same port.
Is it coming on next version ?

Thank you for all the goods you share.

@j4s0n-c
Copy link
Owner

j4s0n-c commented May 1, 2018

It isn't as easy as it seems like it should be to do this in the modules directly. The workaround is to use Purr-Data to route the OSC however you like,
https://github.com/agraef/purr-data/releases
Here is an example patch to get you started...
http://www.geekasaurusrex.net/file.axd?file=2018%2f4%2fosc_router_example.pd

@Outboarder
Copy link
Author

Outboarder commented May 1, 2018

I'm familiar with PD ,also I tested osc in VVVV it works but for some reason it constantly put random 0 between messages. I will check PD and report back.

You Rock

@Outboarder
Copy link
Author

Outboarder commented May 25, 2018

The example PD patch helped me a lot and worked as it's expected.
I use it to connect several cvOSCsv instances via same IP and different ports to Blender.
Here is my twick:
https://imgur.com/9DLl717
https://drive.google.com/open?id=11hvQYoLFc5IC0MH7g7D6H_ILrqJNv7jA
Thanks again.

@Outboarder
Copy link
Author

Thank you very much for the latest update, no need for PD anymore.

@j4s0n-c
Copy link
Owner

j4s0n-c commented Mar 9, 2020

@Outboarder You're very welcome!

@j4s0n-c j4s0n-c closed this as completed Mar 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants