Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for compromised attribute in did Document #8

Open
eum602 opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Add support for compromised attribute in did Document #8

eum602 opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@eum602
Copy link
Member

eum602 commented Jul 26, 2023

Current Behavior:

  • When a key is removed or it has expired it is not added in the did document

With lac1 method, the underlying did registry stores also a flag for each key that specifies whether a key was "compromised" or not, that flag takes relevance for keys that are rotated or removed. Due to the current behavior rotated/removed key use cases are treated as equal since these are just not rendered.

Expected Behavior:

  • I think the expected behavior for "lac1" did method is to also include the concept of "rotation" and "revocation" when a key is no longer valid.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant