Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Field 382 subfields r, s, and t #63

Open
kiegel opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Field 382 subfields r, s, and t #63

kiegel opened this issue Nov 9, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@kiegel
Copy link

kiegel commented Nov 9, 2017

Field 382 (Medium of performance) has a subfield r for Total number of individuals performing alongside ensembles, subfield s for Total number of performers and subfield t for Total number of ensembles. All of the subfields contain only a number.

The conversion places the information in bf:note, which seems awkward to us. The note label contains both the semantics and the number, which does not facilitate machine processing.

Subfield r

    [ a bf:MusicMedium ;
        bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
                rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
        bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
                rdfs:label "Total performers alongside ensembles: 382 r" ] ],

Subfield s

    [ a bf:MusicMedium ;
        bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
                rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
        bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
                rdfs:label "Total performers: 382 s" ] ],

Subfield t

    [ a bf:MusicMedium ;
        bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
                rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
        bf:note [ a bf:Note ;
                rdfs:label "Total ensembles: 382 t" ] ] ;

It is more straightforward to place the semantics in a label and the number in bf:count, which parallels the treatment of subfields e and n from subfields a, b, d and p. It would be very helpful to standardize label texts across cataloging agencies to simplify machine processing.

For example:

Subfield r

    [ a bf:MusicMedium ;
        bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
                rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
    rdfs:label "Total performers alongside ensembles" ;
    bf:count "382 r" ]

Subfield s

    [ a bf:MusicMedium ;
        bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
                rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
    rdfs:label "Total performers" ;
        bf:count "382 s" ]

Subfield t

    [ a bf:MusicMedium ;
        bflc:appliesTo [ a bflc:AppliesTo ;
                rdfs:label "382 3" ] ;
    rdfs:label "Total ensembles" ;
    bf:count "382 t" ]
@wafschneider
Copy link
Collaborator

FWIW, this is more consistent with how subfields e and n are treated in the conversion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants