Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Field 046 #64

Open
kiegel opened this issue Nov 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Field 046 #64

kiegel opened this issue Nov 13, 2017 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@kiegel
Copy link

kiegel commented Nov 13, 2017

It is not clear why field 046 (Special coded dates) is ignored in bib records when there is a specification for conversion in authority records. At a minimum, the same spec can be used in bib records for subfields k and l.

We would like to see subfield o (single or starting date for aggregated content) and subfield p (ending date for aggregated content) included. When a work is an aggregate, the specs for subfields k and l work for o and p as well. It should be relatively easy to include this in the conversion program.

@kiegel
Copy link
Author

kiegel commented Nov 14, 2017

Oops, I was wrong about subfields o and p. bf:temporalCoverage is a better property for them.

@jodiw01
Copy link
Contributor

jodiw01 commented Jan 19, 2024

Conversion of 046 $m and $n was included in marc2bibframe v2.5
Still working an option for 046 $o and $p

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants