Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T Crashes "End of stream receive cycle because of err="EOF", waiting for running transcode jobs to complete" #2702

Closed
Titan-Node opened this issue Dec 28, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Titan-Node
Copy link

Describe the bug
A regular T crashes after a few days of being online.
This didn't happen before, not sure whats causing it. Been transcoding for over a year with this machine.

I1219 13:00:48.901495    9080 ot_rpc.go:128] End of stream receive cycle because of err="EOF", waiting for running transcode jobs to complete

Version 0.5.35

@github-actions github-actions bot added the status: triage this issue has not been evaluated yet label Dec 28, 2022
@leszko
Copy link
Contributor

leszko commented Dec 29, 2022

Thanks for reporting @Titan-Node

Do you maybe have any steps to reproduce? Or it just happens from time to time without any specific reason?

@Titan-Node
Copy link
Author

@leszko trying to reproduce but it happens so infrequently.
Also I should mention it doesn't crash but instead ends up in a state where the program stays alive but does not do any more transcoding and disconnects from the O.

@leszko leszko added area: transcoding status: icebox and removed status: triage this issue has not been evaluated yet labels Jan 10, 2023
@eliteprox
Copy link
Contributor

Yesterday I observed a recurrence of related issue #2605 which I thought was solved in the 0.5.37 release. Three transcoders connected to an O, one is intentionally disconnected and the O loses all streams, no transcoders available. Transcoders map went empty. I will try to reproduce the issue in a test B/O/T configuration as soon as possible.

@Titan-Node
Copy link
Author

I believe this issue was fixed in this PR. #2747
Haven't seen this issue again since the update.
Thanks @eliteprox

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants