Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ALL: UX feedback on search form #406

Open
imcbride opened this issue Dec 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

ALL: UX feedback on search form #406

imcbride opened this issue Dec 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@imcbride
Copy link
Member

https://support.gmhec.org/TDNext/Apps/49/Tickets/TicketDet.aspx?TicketID=17587

As I continue to use the new Drupal 9 web interface, I have a recommendation for efficiency that I think should be considered.

Using the search box requires several steps:

  • click on search box
  • move mouse to search field
  • type in search phrase

Can this be made more efficient?

I would say that the primary efficiency would be the automatic highlighting of the cursor in the text box upon clicking on the search button. Can the second step be removed and otherwise made to be unneeded?

In a super ideal world, the search box might already be visible, and the cursor also already placed for users to simply start typing, but I realize we're not DuckDuckGo or Google. :-)

In summary, the D9 search interface could save one step versus D7 in an ideal world, but it instead adds one step.

@Aterkel
Copy link

Aterkel commented Jan 11, 2022

This makes sense to me. I think we could do something like Bowdain, where the curser ends up in the search box ready to go. Bowdain, Colby, and Bates do it.

https://www.bowdoin.edu/
https://www.colby.edu/
https://www.bates.edu/

If we can make it work, I'm all for it.

Thanks,
Ari

@imcbride imcbride changed the title UX feedback on search form ALL: UX feedback on search form Apr 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants