You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add the ability to explicitly select/query a fee scheme based on type and version
Why
A nice to have: currently a type and case_date is used to select
the scheme applicable. Where case_date is the earliest rep'
order date attached to a claim.
Although the version information for a fee-calc scheme is currently
available in the fee scheme description, it is not queryable. It
might prove useful to be able to select/query a fee scheme based
purely on type and version. Thinking specifically of implementations
of consuming apps that might ask the user what scheme they are
making a claim under.
What
Add the ability to explicitly select/query a fee scheme based on
type
andversion
Why
A nice to have: currently a
type
andcase_date
is used to selectthe scheme applicable. Where
case_date
is the earliest rep'order date attached to a claim.
Although the version information for a fee-calc scheme is currently
available in the fee scheme description, it is not queryable. It
might prove useful to be able to select/query a fee scheme based
purely on
type
andversion
. Thinking specifically of implementationsof consuming apps that might ask the user what scheme they are
making a claim under.
It might, therefore, prove useful to:
a. show what version is returned in the JSON
b. query a specific version using
https://laa-fee-calculator<blah>/api/v1/fee-schemes/?type=LGFS&version=10
see version numbering in LGFS regulations which go a bit funky. Could ask the BA for AGFS equivalent info.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: