You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 24, 2018. It is now read-only.
j: default the timestamp component to just YYYYMMDD? otherwise too long
(add the other when YYYYMMDD isn't sufficient) version can be the longer
name if you want
The general version tagging needs some careful analysis. (for example, we should "respect" any original versioning --like in the set of SWEET 2.3 ontologies). What we currently call "version" is basically just a submission timestamp... Users should have the option to explicitly indicate the version string, etc.
From [email protected] on November 01, 2008 20:58:36
j: default the timestamp component to just YYYYMMDD? otherwise too long
(add the other when YYYYMMDD isn't sufficient) version can be the longer
name if you want
Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/mmisw/issues/detail?id=19
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: