You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Recent builds have been failing the lighthouse performance assertions for the Angular example-client-app. In a commit pushed to main the performance threshold was lowered to 0.8.
We should consider how to resolve the performance issue, some ideas:
The metric is useful and we should listen. Modify the examples such that they have fewer elements by default (buttons to generate rows, combox options, etc) or that the perf warnings about unused JS are addressed
We decide the metric is not useful and decide what we want to get out of the lighthouse review for the example angular app. Maybe we turn-off performance tracking (which might be unfavorable for early detection of drastic changes)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
🧹 Tech Debt
Recent builds have been failing the lighthouse performance assertions for the Angular example-client-app. In a commit pushed to main the performance threshold was lowered to 0.8.
We should consider how to resolve the performance issue, some ideas:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: