Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add functionality to easily visualize spatial distribution of location selection criteria and aggregate criteria score #620

Open
Tracked by #621
Rosejoycrocker opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #650
Assignees

Comments

@Rosejoycrocker
Copy link
Collaborator

Rosejoycrocker commented Dec 4, 2023

Location selection uses a set of normalized, weighted criteria to set locations at which to implement seeding and shading. To understand how and why guided intervention decisions are made, plots of the spatial distribution of these weighted, normalized criteria and the aggregate score calculated from these criteria is very helpful.

The plotting function should use the result set and a scenario dataframe to plot the criteria and aggregate scores. This issue requires changes in #619 and #641 to first be addressed.

@Rosejoycrocker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ConnectedSystems , we previously spoke about how we'd need site-by-site dhws and waves stats in the ResultSet to allow plotting the decision matrices with consistent syntax. I've realised, however, we'd also need the TP matrix to be stored in the result set. What do you think about adding this?

@ConnectedSystems
Copy link
Collaborator

Sure, the connectivity matrix is comparatively a small addition so I don't think it's much of an issue

@Rosejoycrocker
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Sure, the connectivity matrix is comparatively a small addition so I don't think it's much of an issue

Thanks, I'll add an issue for this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants