-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Activities. list of the issues #9683
Comments
@ScharfViktor All of these are ocis issues, we only transform the text, transferring to ocis repo |
Yeah, I agree. but maybe point 1 and 2 relate web? |
I don't think so, grouping needs to be implemented in ocis as well |
I'd also like to link #9536 here |
Both not possible at the moment. Adding multiple users to one share is purely a frontend feature. The backend will create one share for each sharee.
Probably misunderstanding. I assumed the spacename to be there. Needs to be clarified.
Not in scope. Only downloads through links should be logged. Unfortunately we are lacking a way to identify link downloads. However this could be tackled.
Not in scope.
That is because they are the same. Ocis does not differentiate between new file uploads and new version. Both is a
Works as designed. Activities are only bound to
All not in scope.
same as
See |
What does
mean? I think those are more feature requests instead of referring to the initial ticket
Grouping might be achieved via creationDate of the share(s) |
Ah ok. Misunderstood then, sorry. Needs to be decided by PM then.
Might be, yes. But creationDates could be off by milliseconds as they are created one after the other. |
@tbsbdr awareness ping
Fair point, in my simple world, I would just aggregate shares that have been created within a minute (but could give wrong impressions aka wrong data) |
very sadly that we cannot differentiate actions. Let's imagine we're working with one file in space. And when you want to understand what happened to the file -> you go to the activities and see that many users just added similar file to space. aaa? wait.. I already added this file?? who did what? But what? not very informative when you want to figure out what happened |
related owncloud/web#10800
this is mix of the bugs (web and ocis)
I guess some activities are not implemented but I put it to the list for a complete picture
task for implementing tests: #9543
## 1. share resource to many users and groups
Expected:
Actual:
## 2. delete share from many users. looks same as point 1
## 3. upload file into folder
Expected: moss added
file
to folder f12Actual:
## 4. no event for downloading file
Expected:
Actual: no events -> backend issue
## 5. no event for downloading file version
Expected: see event
Actual: no events -> backend issue or maybe it was not implemented
## 6. change file content activity looks similar as uploading file
Expected:
Actual:
moss added New file.odt to Maurice Moss
## 7. whether the user should be able to see all actions that have occurred before he gets access to resource
Steps: - admin creates folder, adds/changes content, creates share to different users - admin shares folder to einstein with edit permissionsExpected: probably einstein should see the activity from the moment access is gained
Actual: einstein see all activities which were happened before
## 8. no event for restoring file
Expected: admin restores file to Admin
Actual: no event
## 9. no activity for share change (role, expiration date)
Expected: it would be nice to know that share was changed and who did it (in the space context)
Actual: no events
## 10. no activity for public link change (role, expiration date, password)
Expected: it would be nice to know that public link was changed and who did it (in the space context)
Actual: no events
## 11. Activity parent resource refs https://github.com//issues/9536
Expected: admin does something subfolder to
parentResource
in SpaceActual: admin added subfolder to Space
## 12. Wrong activity log when public changes file content https://github.com//issues/9676
Expected: public does something
resource
inlocation
Actual: admin added
resource
to Admin## 13. Viewer can see activity of the shared resources: #9849
Expected: no activity for user
Actual:
## 14. Resource id missing in the old activities #9712
Expected: Resource id must be present
Actual: Empty string in place of resource id
## 15. Renaming file with file-id gives move activity instead of rename: #9744
## 16. Activity filter depth:-1 does not list activity: #9850
## 17. Activity lack language translation: #9856
## 18. activity filter limit uncertain behaviour: #9880
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: