[ENHANCEMENT] Ability to change the max packet size

[maxomatic458]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
If your network/vpn does not support IP fragmentation, packet loss can occur

Describe the solution you'd like
Either lower the default packet size, or let the user choose it from within the plugins menu

Describe alternatives you've considered
Dont add it as its a pretty uncommon edge case

Additional context
i was trying to use https://playit.gg/ (a reverse proxy that only needs to be installed on the host side) with Fika, but since they dont support IP fragmentation packets got lost. Building the Plugin from source with a lower packet size fixed that problem

[Lacyway]

Could you tell me exactly which option you want changed?

[maxomatic458]

My idea was to have a ingame dropdown (in the f12 menu)
To select different Mtu sizes (as they are already implemented in the code, but just not configurable)

[Lacyway]

My idea was to have a ingame dropdown (in the f12 menu) To select different Mtu sizes (as they are already implemented in the code, but just not configurable)

I realized I was not very elaborate in my response, sorry.
That sounds like a good idea, rather than a free text field.

Which part of the NetManager would you like this to affect?

[maxomatic458]

i think this could be implemented here
but im actually not sure if that covers all the packets

Fika-Plugin/Fika.Core/Networking/LiteNetLib/NetConstants.cs

Lines 57 to 70 in b9a0094

	internal static readonly int[] PossibleMtu =
	{
	576 - MaxUdpHeaderSize, //minimal (RFC 1191)
	1024, //most games standard
	1232 - MaxUdpHeaderSize,
	1460 - MaxUdpHeaderSize, //google cloud
	1472 - MaxUdpHeaderSize, //VPN
	1492 - MaxUdpHeaderSize, //Ethernet with LLC and SNAP, PPPoE (RFC 1042)
	1500 - MaxUdpHeaderSize //Ethernet II (RFC 1191)
	};
	//Max possible single packet size
	public static readonly int MaxPacketSize = PossibleMtu[PossibleMtu.Length - 1];
	public static readonly int MaxUnreliableDataSize = MaxPacketSize - HeaderSize;

[Lacyway]

Thanks, I will look into it when I have the time.

[ArchangelWTF]

Without making significant changes to LiteNetLib this wont be possible, then there's even the question of if we'd want to support such configurations as they would make it harder to deal with issues in the Discord. Closing for now.