Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Publish list of YouTube SHA256 hashes and make the action automatically validate the YouTube IPA #1501

Open
2 tasks done
gamer191 opened this issue Jun 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@gamer191
Copy link

Have you read the FAQ?

  • Yes, I did read the FAQ

Is there an existing issue/question for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Do you think this is a bug?

❌ No, I don't think this is a bug. I will explain below

My question

There is no suggestion template, so I figured question was better than issue. Anyway, I was wondering whether you’d be able to publish a list of SHA256 hashes of the YouTube ipa, and have the GitHub action automatically validate it (by default).

Disclaimer: I would assume publishing hashes would be fine, since lots of existing legitimate projects (such as redump) publish hashes of copyrighted content. However, IANAL

Additional context

No response

@gamer191 gamer191 added the question Further information is requested label Jun 23, 2024
@yodaluca23
Copy link

Things and enviroment can vary, each .ipa even built off the same commit probably has a different hash...

@gamer191
Copy link
Author

I’m talking about the input IPA that the user puts into the GitHub action

@yodaluca23
Copy link

I’m talking about the input IPA that the user puts into the GitHub action

Well those would certainly have different hashes, different dumping programs dump differently, plus each ios + phone combination have slightly different .ipa's even if you were to strip the app thinning, it would basically impossible to get the same decrypted .ipa file twice, even in the same environment, same tools.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants