Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Better control of current totality status #21

Open
craff opened this issue Nov 3, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Better control of current totality status #21

craff opened this issue Nov 3, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@craff
Copy link
Collaborator

craff commented Nov 3, 2017 •
edited
Loading

When writing
let f = fun x ...
or even applications, or dependant product, we have no short way to indicate the current totality we want.

Do we need something (like more than one keyword for fun ?)
@craff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

craff commented Nov 22, 2017

Moved to project

@craff craff closed this as completed Nov 22, 2017
@craff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

craff commented Nov 22, 2017

Reopen as the is a FIXME in the code : we have notation for the arrow: ~>, -> and =>
But we only have one dependant product!

@craff craff reopened this Nov 22, 2017
@craff
Copy link
Collaborator Author

craff commented Dec 1, 2017

A use case is in

  • test/phd_examples/demo.pml

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@craff