Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

sage.tensor.modules: Add backend using NumPy ndarray #30308

Open
mkoeppe opened this issue Aug 7, 2020 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #38325
Open

sage.tensor.modules: Add backend using NumPy ndarray #30308

mkoeppe opened this issue Aug 7, 2020 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #38325

Comments

@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member

mkoeppe commented Aug 7, 2020

https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/arrays.ndarray.html#the-n-dimensional-array-ndarray

https://numpy.org/doc/stable/user/basics.indexing.html#basics-indexing

Component: linear algebra

Issue created by migration from https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30308

@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-9.2 milestone Aug 7, 2020
@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.2, sage-9.3 Aug 13, 2020
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Feb 13, 2021

comment:3

Setting new milestone based on a cursory review of ticket status, priority, and last modification date.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.3, sage-9.4 Feb 13, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.4, sage-9.5 Jul 19, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.5, sage-9.6 Dec 14, 2021
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.6, sage-9.7 Mar 5, 2022
@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.7, sage-9.8 Aug 31, 2022
@mkoeppe

This comment has been minimized.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe modified the milestones: sage-9.8, sage-9.9 Jan 7, 2023
@Kd-Here
Copy link

Kd-Here commented Feb 25, 2023

Could you please explain it more what to do here?

@mkoeppe mkoeppe removed this from the sage-10.0 milestone Mar 16, 2023
@mkoeppe
Copy link
Member Author

mkoeppe commented Mar 7, 2024

The idea would be to have a separate class that can be used instead of the class Components in sage.tensor.modules.comp when the user asks for it.

This would be similar to how Matrix in Sage supports multiple backends (implementations), depending on the base ring, i.e., what kinds of elements are in the matrix.

@mkoeppe mkoeppe added the gsoc: 2024 Tag for GSoC2024 issues/PRs label Jun 2, 2024
@amanmoon amanmoon linked a pull request Jul 2, 2024 that will close this issue
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants