Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validate "X-PSU-IP-Address" against pattern #92

Closed
svenbiellmann opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Validate "X-PSU-IP-Address" against pattern #92

svenbiellmann opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
wont be implemented Issue will not be considered/implemented

Comments

@svenbiellmann
Copy link
Contributor

svenbiellmann commented May 16, 2024

Subsequent entry of issue for existing pull request to ensure traceability.

Content of issue: Just a little more strict definition of the input for "X-PSU-IP-Address".

@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann self-assigned this May 16, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann added the enhancement Issue requires improvements or additions to interface functionality label May 16, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann added this to the v5.0 milestone May 16, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann linked a pull request May 16, 2024 that will close this issue
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann added new Newly submitted issue and removed new Newly submitted issue labels May 16, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann removed the new Newly submitted issue label Jun 21, 2024
@svenbiellmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Meeting Notes 20.6.24

The pattern for covering all variations of IP4 and IP6 addresses is very complex.

Dominik K. has suggested that only a few options shall be allowed in order to reduce the complexity of the pattern. The pattern will restrict to these options.

On next meeting 15th August this issue will be discussed with the requestor. The requestor can provide feedback on which patterns shall be allowed.

@svenbiellmann
Copy link
Contributor Author

svenbiellmann commented Aug 18, 2024

Meeting Notes 15.8.24

It was stated that the effort due to IP V6 validation would be unproportional high. Therefore the issue / Pull Request is
rejected.

@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 18, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann removed this from the v5.0 milestone Aug 18, 2024
@svenbiellmann svenbiellmann added wont be implemented Issue will not be considered/implemented and removed enhancement Issue requires improvements or additions to interface functionality labels Aug 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
wont be implemented Issue will not be considered/implemented
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant