Paper Review

[pravirkr]

The submitted draft looks great! Few comments:

• fast radio transients like pulsars -> I do not think pulsars should be classified as transients; maybe add giant pulses or single-pulse from pulsars
• "streamline the pipeline" -> search pipeline?
• "candidate events:" -> candidate events,
• Fix citation for Astropy (missing @ in astropy:2018)

Other suggestions:

• citation for Heimdall -> I prefer B. R. Barsdell thesis as the more appropriate citation for Heimdall than the usually cited reference in the literature (which has more to do with dedisp)

This issue is part of my JOSS review.

[KshitijAggarwal]

Made the suggested changed with 24e2e15

For "fast radio transients like pulsars": I guess it is a personal preference. I think of them as fast transients which are periodic. Each pulse would still be a transient. I've modified it to ".. like pulsar single pulses, ..."

For "candidate events:" as we are listing some analysis that can be done on the candidate events, I think a colon is better here.