source for vernacularname, distribution and description

[peterdesmet]

Should we add a source to vernacularname, distribution and description? It is probably all the checklist itself, so not really relevant?

[peterdesmet]

Note: on GBIF, a species page will show aggregated information from different sources and will indicate the title of the published checklist as the source. See e.g. description info at: https://www.gbif.org/species/5682465

So, if our source is the fishes checklist itself (rather than aggregated from elsewhere), than it is maybe not that relevant to indicate that.

[LienReyserhove]

imo, I would provide the sources for these data in the metadata (which can be found in the description)

[peterdesmet]

Question 1: does Hugo have the sources on which the info in the checklist is build?

Question 2: do we know which source was used for what information?