Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace occupancy with AoO on indicator graphs and in workflows #89

Open
timadriaens opened this issue Jun 16, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@timadriaens
Copy link
Member

Hi, just a detail for the occurrence indicator graphs Y-axis legend: Occupancy, in principle, is mostly used for the probability that a site is occupied (and expressed between 0 and 1) cf. site occupancy models. What we look at in TrIAS is Area of Occupancy the way IUCN use it to quantify range size for species. This is an interesting paper about the concept.

@damianooldoni we should probably change the legend for the Y axis to "Area of Occupancy (km2)" to avoid confusion.

@damianooldoni damianooldoni self-assigned this Jun 16, 2020
@damianooldoni
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, @timadriaens. I agree. I will solve it after making new cubes and so having new data.

@qgroom
Copy link

qgroom commented Jun 16, 2020

I thought we just look at the occupancy in any one year. Normally, survey intensity is not great enough to get the true 1km area of occupancy after just one year. The IUCN usually aggregates over a number of years, but we can't do that.

@damianooldoni damianooldoni changed the title occupancy versus AoO on indicator graphs Replace occupancy with AoO on indicator graphs and in workflows Sep 13, 2022
@damianooldoni damianooldoni removed their assignment Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants