You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, just a detail for the occurrence indicator graphs Y-axis legend: Occupancy, in principle, is mostly used for the probability that a site is occupied (and expressed between 0 and 1) cf. site occupancy models. What we look at in TrIAS is Area of Occupancy the way IUCN use it to quantify range size for species. This is an interesting paper about the concept.
@damianooldoni we should probably change the legend for the Y axis to "Area of Occupancy (km2)" to avoid confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I thought we just look at the occupancy in any one year. Normally, survey intensity is not great enough to get the true 1km area of occupancy after just one year. The IUCN usually aggregates over a number of years, but we can't do that.
damianooldoni
changed the title
occupancy versus AoO on indicator graphs
Replace occupancy with AoO on indicator graphs and in workflows
Sep 13, 2022
Hi, just a detail for the occurrence indicator graphs Y-axis legend: Occupancy, in principle, is mostly used for the probability that a site is occupied (and expressed between 0 and 1) cf. site occupancy models. What we look at in TrIAS is Area of Occupancy the way IUCN use it to quantify range size for species. This is an interesting paper about the concept.
@damianooldoni we should probably change the legend for the Y axis to "Area of Occupancy (km2)" to avoid confusion.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: