Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can we get grades of spunbond NWPP added? #3

Open
paul-hammant opened this issue Apr 29, 2021 · 8 comments
Open

Can we get grades of spunbond NWPP added? #3

paul-hammant opened this issue Apr 29, 2021 · 8 comments

Comments

@paul-hammant
Copy link

  • 38 gsm smart fab
  • 68 gsm smart fab

other too perhaps?

@tsipkens
Copy link
Owner

This is a good idea. We are generally looking into expanding the number of available non-woven materials and will also consider adding some of this information in the future.

@paul-hammant
Copy link
Author

paul-hammant commented Jan 5, 2022

Screenshot from your app:

image

945 GSM shown in your chart.

I've results for SmartFab single weight layered up to @ 1064 GSN (same NIOSh flow rate) -
image

That pic from page - https://fu-cv.blogspot.com/2021/08/lab-tests-for-spunbond-polypropylene.html

I've also results from an 80 GSM x 6 layers test same flow rate, 300 nm particles:

image

That pic from doc - https://paulhammant.com/files/Spunbond_Polypropylene-suitability_for_high_filtration_masks.pdf

These results are way higher than the one of the 'fmviz' app as you have it.

@tsipkens
Copy link
Owner

tsipkens commented Jan 6, 2022

I am going to forward this to our team for discussion later this week to see if we can come up with some kind of solution. Thanks for reminding me about this thread.

@tsipkens
Copy link
Owner

As an initial improvement, Smartfab entries now indicate the grams per square meter (GSM) in the description instead of "thick". Specifically, "Smartfab, thick" corresponds to 63 GSM.

@paul-hammant
Copy link
Author

paul-hammant commented Jan 14, 2022 via email

@tsipkens
Copy link
Owner

We measured our as-received material (which we received indirectly) to be 63 GSM. This is to say, THE 63 GSM value is based on weighing the material rather than the information given by the manufacturer.

@paul-hammant
Copy link
Author

paul-hammant commented Jan 14, 2022 via email

@tsipkens
Copy link
Owner

This remains interesting. I have sent an email to continue this discussion in a different format.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants