Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 12, 2018. It is now read-only.

Availability of users for research and testing #57

Open
kwehmueller opened this issue Aug 10, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Availability of users for research and testing #57

kwehmueller opened this issue Aug 10, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@kwehmueller
Copy link

Question/Comment on this U.S. Tax Court RFQ

Name and affiliation

Kevin Wehmueller
Business Development Strategist, Taoti Creative

Section of RFP documents

https://github.com/ustaxcourt/case-management-rfq/blob/master/02_SOW.md#description-of-work-to-be-performed

Question/Comment

The RFQ states:

Additional Court representatives will be promptly available as needed to assist in the development process, including for internal user testing. The Court will arrange for any necessary external user testing.

The Court’s current internal management and staffing levels are not adequate to allow for effective coordination with more than one development team, at least during the initial stages of the development process.

How many internal Court Representatives are expected to participate in internal user testing, and how will they interact with the system (especially with regard to initial development goals including identity and access management, case initiation, payment of fees, search functionality, e-signatures, notes, and content management)? Are all representatives located in Washington, DC?

@USTCClerk
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your question. The Tax Court has answered it in an Amendment to RFQ which is available at https://github.com/ustaxcourt/case-management-rfq/blob/master/Amendment_to_RFQ.pdf

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants