Documentation

[kwehmueller]

Question/Comment on this U.S. Tax Court RFQ

Name and affiliation

Kevin Wehmueller
Business Development Strategist, Taoti Creative

Section of RFP documents

https://github.com/ustaxcourt/case-management-rfq/blob/master/02_SOW.md#deliverables-and-performance-standards

https://github.com/ustaxcourt/case-management-rfq/blob/master/03_Evaluation_Criteria.md#similar-experience

Question/Comment

Are we correct in assuming that source code samples will be evaluated for the extent to which they are well-documented and in line with the performance standards described in the Deliverables section? For reference:

Documentation
All dependencies are listed and the licenses are documented. Major functionality in the software/source code is documented. Individual methods are documented inline using comments that permit the use tools such as JsDoc. System diagram is provided.

[USTCClerk]

Thank you for your question. The Tax Court has answered it in an Amendment to RFQ which is available at https://github.com/ustaxcourt/case-management-rfq/blob/master/Amendment_to_RFQ.pdf