-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
258: Improve docs snippets in prior distributions page r=odunbar a=odunbar <!--- THESE LINES ARE COMMENTED --> ## Purpose <!--- One sentence to describe the purpose of this PR, refer to any linked issues: #14 -- this will link to issue 14 Closes #2 -- this will automatically close issue 2 on PR merge --> Closes #256 Closes #255 ## Content <!--- specific tasks that are currently complete - Solution implemented --> - Added more accessible `using` statements to begin snippets that are likely to be copy+pasted by readers - Added what is brought in with `using` statements - bugfix example ## Extras - resolved some tests fail on Julia `1` testing (here, `1.8.5`), due to updates (bugs) in global rng / Distributions Docs page [here](https://clima.github.io/EnsembleKalmanProcesses.jl/previews/PR258/parameter_distributions/) <!--- Review checklist I have: - followed the codebase contribution guide: https://clima.github.io/ClimateMachine.jl/latest/Contributing/ - followed the style guide: https://clima.github.io/ClimateMachine.jl/latest/DevDocs/CodeStyle/ - followed the documentation policy: https://github.com/CliMA/policies/wiki/Documentation-Policy - checked that this PR does not duplicate an open PR. In the Content, I have included - relevant unit tests, and integration tests, - appropriate docstrings on all functions, structs, and modules, and included relevant documentation. --> ---- - [x] I have read and checked the items on the review checklist. Co-authored-by: odunbar <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
132 additions
and
56 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.