Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency jest-mock-extended to v3 #610

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jun 19, 2023

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
jest-mock-extended 1.0.18 -> 3.0.7 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

marchaos/jest-mock-extended (jest-mock-extended)

v3.0.7

Compare Source

Bumped ts-essentials

v3.0.6

Compare Source

v3.0.5

Compare Source

Fixed Deep Mock perf issue with https://github.com/marchaos/jest-mock-extended/pull/123

v3.0.4

Compare Source

  • Updated jest dependencies
  • Updated typescript peerDependencies to allow for typescript 5.*

v3.0.3

Compare Source

v3.0.2

Compare Source

Added https://github.com/marchaos/jest-mock-extended/pull/110

v3.0.1

Compare Source

Allow overriding calledWithFn - see https://github.com/marchaos/jest-mock-extended/pull/96

v3.0.0

Compare Source

mockDeep({ funcPropSupport: true });

however this comes with a recursive performance cost. We hope to address this in the future.

v2.0.9

Compare Source

v2.0.8

Compare Source

v2.0.7

Compare Source

Fixes

v2.0.6

Compare Source

Support for Jest 28

v2.0.5

Compare Source

Fixes:

v2.0.4

Compare Source

PRs:

v2.0.3

Compare Source

v2.0.1

Compare Source

v2.0.0

Compare Source

  • Changed mock() to no longer use recursive types. Only deepMock() does that now. This should reduce the tsc compile time for large projects.
  • Added stub() for usecases where you need a mock object with no expectations.
  • Added support for Jest 27, although blocked by https://github.com/facebook/jest/issues/11677

Potential backwards compatibility issues for use of mock() where deepMock() may be required. This may result in TS errors.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #610 (a918464) into master (3704f5a) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Your organization is not using the GitHub App Integration. As a result you may experience degraded service beginning May 15th. Please install the Github App Integration for your organization. Read more.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #610   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.39%   86.39%           
=======================================
  Files         197      197           
  Lines        6048     6048           
  Branches     1128     1128           
=======================================
  Hits         5225     5225           
  Misses        823      823           

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-mock-extended-3.x branch from a918464 to fd418cb Compare August 3, 2023 08:23
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-mock-extended-3.x branch from fd418cb to e0e0756 Compare April 9, 2024 22:48
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/jest-mock-extended-3.x branch from e0e0756 to 02d5feb Compare May 2, 2024 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant