Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adaptive Retry Mechanism #7

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024
Merged

Adaptive Retry Mechanism #7

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

DontEatOreo
Copy link
Owner

Features

Adaptive Retry Mechanism for Compression

  • Implemented an interactive retry mechanism that is triggered when the output video is larger than the original file. resolution and Constant Rate Factor (CRF) have been made adjustable within this retry workflow.
  • Introduced a ValidResolutions array in the Globals component.

Refactoring

Conversion Process Configuration Improvements

  • Simplified the input stream type to IList<IStream> from IEnumerable<IStream> which eliminates unnecessary conversion to a list within the method.
  • Resolved improper usage of output file extensions for VP9 & AV1 codecs.
  • For AV1, switched color space from yuv420 to yuv420p10le. (It's a common practice to use 420p10le for AV1.)

Parsing Simplification

  • Simplified start and end time parsing.

RootCommand Adjustments

  • Now uses Globals variables to validate resolutions (ValidResolutions) and video codecs (VideoCodecs).

Other Changes

Settings Description Expansion

  • Enhanced the description by including video codec and resolution information.
  • Now, the Settings Description includes the available options for resolution and video codec.

- Added video codec information
- Added resolution information
- Use ValidResolutions to check resoluions
- Use VideoCodecs to check video codecs
- Now we take `IList<IStream>` instead of `IEnumerable<IStream>`, eliminating the need to convert to a list within the method
- Fix inappopriate usage of output file extension for VP9 & AV1
- AV1 using `yuv420p10le` instead of `yuv420`
- Implement an interactive retry mechanism that activates when output video is larger than the original
- Make resolution and Constant Rate Factor (CRF) adjustable within the retry workflow
- Include user prompts to enter custom resolution and CRF values during retries
@DontEatOreo DontEatOreo merged commit 40759b0 into master Feb 7, 2024
@DontEatOreo DontEatOreo deleted the retry-mechanism branch February 7, 2024 11:51
@DontEatOreo
Copy link
Owner Author

@CodiumAI-Agent /review

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Implementing an adaptive retry mechanism for video compression and refactoring code for better performance and readability.
  • 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces an adaptive retry mechanism that triggers when the output video is larger than the original file. It also includes significant refactoring, such as simplifying the input stream type, improving the conversion process configuration, and simplifying parsing. The PR also expands the settings description to include video codec and resolution information.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 4, because the PR includes significant changes in the logic of the video conversion process, which requires a deep understanding of the codebase and the video conversion process.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and includes a good amount of refactoring, which improves the code's readability and performance. The adaptive retry mechanism is a valuable addition, as it can help to ensure the quality of the output video. However, it would be beneficial to include unit tests to verify the new logic and changes. Also, it would be helpful to handle exceptions more specifically rather than catching the general Exception, which can make debugging easier.

🤖 Code feedback:
relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

Consider handling exceptions more specifically. Instead of catching the general Exception, catch the specific exceptions that you expect might be thrown (e.g., IOException, ArgumentException). This can make debugging easier and can also prevent catching unexpected exceptions that might be better not caught. [important]

relevant linecatch (Exception)

relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

It seems that the HandleCancellation method is attached to the Console.CancelKeyPress event every time the while loop runs. This could lead to multiple event handlers being attached if the while loop runs more than once. Consider attaching the event handler outside of the while loop to avoid this. [important]

relevant lineConsole.CancelKeyPress += HandleCancellation;

relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

The ShouldRetry method seems to be doing a lot of things, including asking for user input and deleting files. Consider breaking this method down into smaller, more focused methods to improve readability and maintainability. [medium]

relevant lineprivate bool ShouldRetry(Settings s, string outP, List enumerable)

relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

The ChangeCrfValue method currently uses a while loop to repeatedly ask for user input until a valid input is provided. Consider adding a limit to the number of attempts to prevent an infinite loop if the user keeps providing invalid input. [medium]

relevant lineprivate static bool ChangeCrfValue(Settings s)


✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the code feedback section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

About the 'Code feedback' section

The review tool provides several type of feedbacks, one of them is code suggestions.
If you are interested only in the code suggestions, it is recommended to use the improve feature instead, since it dedicated only to code suggestions, and usually gives better results.
Use the review tool if you want to get a more comprehensive feedback, which includes code suggestions as well.

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_review, enable_review_labels_effort, and more.

More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

@CodiumAI-Agent
Copy link

PR Review

     PR feedback                    
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

4, because the PR introduces significant changes across multiple files, including new features, refactoring, and adjustments to existing functionality. The complexity of the adaptive retry mechanism, changes to the conversion process, and the use of global variables for validation require careful review to ensure correctness and maintainability.

🧪 Relevant tests

No

🔍 Possible issues
  • The retry mechanism could lead to an infinite loop if the conditions for retry (compressedSize > originalSize) persist after adjustments.
  • Parsing of CRF values does not handle non-numeric input gracefully, potentially causing an unhandled exception.
  • The deletion of the converted video file is not confirmed before proceeding, which might lead to accidental data loss.
  • The change in pixel format for AV1 codec to 'yuv420p10le' without a corresponding change in the output file extension could lead to compatibility issues with some players.
🔒 Security concerns

No

Code feedback:
relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

Consider implementing a maximum retry limit for the adaptive retry mechanism to prevent potential infinite loops. This could be a fixed number or based on user input. [important]

relevant lineif (compressedSize > originalSize)

relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

Validate the CRF input to ensure it is a numeric value before attempting to parse and use it in the conversion settings. This prevents potential runtime errors from non-numeric input. [important]

relevant linevar crfValue = int.Parse(new string(crfAnswer.Where(char.IsDigit).ToArray()));

relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/Converter.cs
suggestion      

Before deleting the converted video file, ensure that the user's intent is confirmed to prevent accidental data loss. This could involve a more explicit confirmation step or warning. [medium]

relevant lineFile.Delete(path);

relevant fileCommandLineApp/Conversion/ProcessHandler.cs
suggestion      

For AV1 codec conversions, ensure the output file extension reflects the change in pixel format to 'yuv420p10le'. This might involve adding a conditional check to set the appropriate file extension. [medium]

relevant lineconversion.SetPixelFormat(PixelFormat.yuv420p10le);


✨ Review tool usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...
Utilizing extra instructions

The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

Examples for extra instructions:

[pr_reviewer] # /review #
extra_instructions="""
In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
- Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
- Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
- Is the code logic efficient?
...
"""

Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

How to enable\disable automation
  • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
pr_commands = ["/review", ...]

meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

Auto-labels

The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

  • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
  • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
Extra sub-tools

The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

Auto-approve PRs

By invoking:

/review auto_approve

The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

[pr_reviewer]
enable_auto_approval = true

(this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

[pr_reviewer]
maximal_review_effort = 5
More PR-Agent commands

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

  • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
  • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
  • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
  • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
  • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
  • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
  • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
  • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

See the tools guide for more details.
To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants