Version 4.0.0

[Eastrall]

Version 4.0.0

Added

• Add .NET 7 support (Support EFCore 7.0 #42)
• Add fluent annotation support (Add Mark by Fluent Api #44)
• Add fluent API sample

Changes

⚠️ BREAKING CHANGE ⚠️

• Changed IEncryptionProvider interface to be simpler to use:
  • byte[] Encrypt(byte[] input) instead of TStore Encrypt<TStore, TModel>(TModel dataToEncrypt, Func<TModel, byte[]> converter, Func<Stream, TStore> encoder);
  • byte[] Decrypt(byte[] input) instead of TModel Decrypt<TStore, TModel>(TStore dataToDecrypt, Func<TStore, byte[]> decoder, Func<Stream, TModel> converter);

Other changes

• Add GitHub action support with build matrix (.NET Core 3.1, .NET 5, .NET 6, .NET 7)
• Update README.md documentation for creating a custom encryption provider. (Pleas update docs for IEncryptionProvider #37)
• Update projects to C# 10 and file scoped namespaces

Removals

⚠️ BREAKING CHANGE ⚠️

• Removing constructor AesProvider(byte[] key, CipherMode mode = CipherMode.CBC, PaddingMode padding = PaddingMode.PKCS7) on AesProvider.
• Removed dynamic IV support.
  • To add dynamic IV support, you will have to create your own encryption provider.
• Removed Data Migration support.

Other removals

• Remove AzureDevOps pipelines.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (main@de814ed). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #45   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   94.36%           
=======================================
  Files           ?        6           
  Lines           ?      142           
  Branches        ?       28           
=======================================
  Hits            ?      134           
  Misses          ?        3           
  Partials        ?        5           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[sominola]

)

[Uli-Armbruster]

looks good to me. can you ship this?

[Eastrall]

@Uli-Armbruster I need to run some more tests for byte[] encryption as a Base64 string, I noticed that V3.X has a major issue with this scenario. Encryption process goes well, but decryption process adds some extra 0 bytes to the original value, and unfortunatly there nothing I can do about it. So, I will most likely drop the support for encrypting a byte[] as a Base64 string.

I'll keep you updated on this.

[Uli-Armbruster]

@Uli-Armbruster I need to run some more tests for byte[] encryption as a Base64 string, I noticed that V3.X has a major issue with this scenario. Encryption process goes well, but decryption process adds some extra 0 bytes to the original value, and unfortunatly there nothing I can do about it. So, I will most likely drop the support for encrypting a byte[] as a Base64 string.

I'll keep you updated on this.

For my understanding: When I have an Entity with a property of type byte[], then there would be under certain circumstances failures in encryption since extra 0 bytes are added?