PASSION:Towards Effective Incomplete Multi-Modal Medical Image Segmentation
with Imbalanced Missing Rates
Junjie Shi1 ,Caozhi Shang1 ,Zhaobin Sun1 ,Li Yu1 ,Xin Yang1 ,Zengqiang Yan1 📧
🏢 1 Huazhong University of Science and Technology, (📧) corresponding author.
🧐 ArXivPreprint | OpenReview
Jul. 25th, 2024: We made some refinements and optimizations to the code, including:- Unified the model implementation and the options of training settings;
- Improved the part of multi-card and multi-batch parallel computation;
- Fixed some bugs due to the late modification of models.
Notes:If you find our Figure. 2 in paper is garbled, try to switch the way you read it, e.g. Google Chrome, and we will change the figure from pdf to png format in the future.
Jul. 21th, 2024: Our work is further selected as an Oral presentation (3.97% in total 4385 submissions), OpenReview is open to public.Jul. 20th, 2024: We released our code and submitted our paper on ArXiv.
Incomplete multi-modal image segmentation is a fundamental task in medical imaging to refine deployment efficiency when only partial modalities are available. However, the common practice that complete-modality data is visible during model training is far from realistic, as modalities can have imbalanced missing rates in clinical scenarios. In this paper, we, for the first time, formulate such a challenging setting and propose Preference-Aware Self-diStillatION (PASSION) for incomplete multi-modal medical image segmentation under imbalanced missing rates. Specifically, we first construct pixel-wise and semantic-wise self-distillation to balance the optimization objective of each modality. Then, we define relative preference to evaluate the dominance of each modality during training, based on which to design task-wise and gradient-wise regularization to balance the convergence rates of different modalities. Experimental results on two publicly available multi-modal datasets demonstrate the superiority of PASSION against existing approaches for modality balancing. More importantly, PASSION is validated to work as a plug-and-play module for consistent performance improvement across different backbones.
We recommend using conda to setup the environment. See the requirements.txt for environment configuration.
All our experiments are implemented based on the PyTorch framework with one 24G NVIDIA Geforce RTX 3090 GPU, and we recommend installing the following package versions:
- python=3.8
- pytorch=1.12.1
- torchvision=0.13.1
Dependency packages can be installed using following command:
git clone https://github.com/Jun-Jie-Shi/PASSION.git
cd PASSION
conda create --name passion python=3.8
conda activate passion
pip install -r requirements.txtYou can download the preprocessed dataset (e.g. BraTS2020) from RFNet and unzip them in the datasets/BraTS folder.
tar -xzf BRATS2020_Training_none_npy.tar.gzThe data-split is available in the datasets/BraTS/BRATS2020_Training_none_npy folder, and our imbalanced missing rates data-split is available in the datasets/BraTS/brats_split folder.
If you want to preprocess by yourself, the preprocessing code code/preprocessing/preprocess_brats.py is also provided, just download BRATS2020_Training_Data in datasets/BraTS folder.
Notes: Here our default path BRATS2020_Training_Data may refer to BRATS2020_Training_Data/MICCAI_BRATS2020_Training_Data if you download in kaggle.
And if you want to divide data by yourself, data_split.py and generate_imb_mr.py in the code/preprocessing folder is available. (Here we only provide the preprocessing for BraTS, if you want to use other datasets, just do it similarly)
If your folder structure (especially for datasets path) is as follows:
PASSION/
├── datasets
│ ├── BraTS
│ │ ├── BRATS2020_Training_Data
│ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_001
│ │ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_001_flair.nii.gz
│ │ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_001_seg.nii.gz
│ │ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_001_t1.nii.gz
│ │ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_001_t1ce.nii.gz
│ │ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_001_t2.nii.gz
│ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_002
│ │ │ │ ├── ...
│ │ │ ├── ...
│ │ │ ├── BraTS20_Training_369
│ │ │ │ ├── ...
├── code
│ ├── ...
└── ...
you can simply conduct the preprocessing as following:
python code/preprocessing/preprocess_brats.py
python code/preprocessing/data_split.py
python code/preprocessing/generate_imb_mr.pyAfter preprocessing, your folder structure is assumed to be:
PASSION/
├── datasets
│ ├── BraTS
│ │ ├── BRATS2020_Training_Data
│ │ │ ├── ...
│ │ ├── BRATS2020_Training_none_npy
│ │ │ ├── seg
│ │ │ ├── vol
│ │ │ ├── test.txt
│ │ │ ├── train.txt
│ │ │ ├── val.txt
│ │ ├── brats_split
│ │ │ ├── Brats2020_imb_split_mr2468.csv
├── code
│ ├── ...
└── ...
Before start training, you should check the options in code/options.py, especially for datasets path. Our code-notes may help you.
Our default relative datapath is according to our folder structure, if your datapath is different, just change datarootPath and datasetPath as your absolute data-saving root-path and dataset-saving path.
Other path setting like imbmrpath and savepath is also noteworthy.
You can conduct the experiment as following if everything is ready.
cd ./code
python train.py --use_passion
For evaluation, the eval.py is simply implemented, just change the corresponding checkpoint path resume and other path settings.
Some bash scripts in code/scripts folder may be useful.
The implementation is based on the repos: RFNet, mmFormer, RedCore, we'd like to express our gratitude to these open-source works.
If you find PASSION is useful in your research or applications, welcome to cite our paper and give us a star 🌟.
@article{passion,
title={PASSION: Towards Effective Incomplete Multi-Modal Medical Image Segmentation with Imbalanced Missing Rates},
author={Junjie Shi and Caozhi Shang and Zhaobin Sun and Li Yu and Xin Yang and Zengqiang Yan},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.14796},
year={2024}
}If you have any other questions, feel free to reach me at '[email protected]'.
