C elegens metadata

[bendichter]

Motivation

From conversation with Daniel Sprague:

I was wondering if there were possible changes we could make to the restrictions imposed on age and sex. C. elegans growth stages are defined from L1-L4 followed by adulthood. Most of the worms we use are designated 'YA' for young adult. I believe for our purposes, this is a more useful designation than dahs or weeks old since the lifesplan of the owrm is relatively short. Furthermore, for sex, C. elegans have two sexes: male 'XO' and hermaphrodite 'XX' which are designated by their sex chromosomes. I see that there is an option for other, but since the hermaphrodite is the typical system we study, I think it would be useful to be able to just input the chromosomal designations if that's possible.

What do you think, @CodyCBakerPhD ?

[CodyCBakerPhD]

XX and XO appear to be officially designated for this species, so yes perfectly fine by me

[CodyCBakerPhD]

The other life cycle stuff is a part of the ongoing discussion for handling age: #209

[CodyCBakerPhD]

Just need a couple tests and this is good to go

[CodyCBakerPhD]

@rly I remember you mentioning something about the reasons the DANDI tests are failing - can you confirm there is no easy way to fix the CI here?

[rly]

The tests fail because dandi raises DeprecationWarnings into errors. We have a fix in the dev branch of PyNWB that we haven't released yet. I'm getting to it...

[CodyCBakerPhD]

The tests fail because dandi raises DeprecationWarnings into errors. We have a fix in the dev branch of PyNWB that we haven't released yet. I'm getting to it...

Thanks for confirming, no huge rush on my end I just wanted to know for sure

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #353 (c8c595a) into dev (c5e9770) will decrease coverage by 0.16%.
The diff coverage is 33.33%.

❗ Current head c8c595a differs from pull request most recent head 39f0880. Consider uploading reports for the commit 39f0880 to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #353      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.13%   90.98%   -0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          20       20              
  Lines        1117     1120       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         1018     1019       +1     
- Misses         99      101       +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.98% <33.33%> (-0.16%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/nwbinspector/checks/nwbfile_metadata.py	97.24% <33.33%> (-1.81%)	⬇️

[CodyCBakerPhD]

@rly Good to merge?