Solve a discrepancy in pill 7.7 #222
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Solve the discrepancy between the code and its description
drupol
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2023
|
FYI: If this PR is fine with you, I will probably spend some time this week to update pill 8.3 in a similar fashion (it is still written as if |
|
We are super happy to receive contributions for documentation, so please keep them coming :) |
jtojnar
reviewed
Apr 9, 2024
Comment on lines
+304
to
+305
| <varname>pkgs</varname> and brings it into scope. This has an effect similar to | ||
| the <command>:l <nixpkgs></command> we used in <application>nix repl</application>, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think the :l mention only makes sense as a reference to with, since both bring the attributes inside pkgs into the scope.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related issue
Closes #221
Notes
Two choices were made:
<nixpkgs>have to be referred to as members of the set assigned to local variablepkgs;withkeyword, although it would be the one-to-one equivalent of what was done in the REPL.Edits allowed.