Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

periodic ADBM rewiring #82

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jul 5, 2019
Merged

periodic ADBM rewiring #82

merged 13 commits into from
Jul 5, 2019

Conversation

evadelmas
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR introduces periodic rewiring for the ADBM model

Partially deals with #71

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #82 into next will increase coverage by 0.64%.
The diff coverage is 94.73%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             next      #82      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.11%   87.76%   +0.64%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines         885      891       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          771      782      +11     
+ Misses        114      109       -5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/make_parameters.jl 98.54% <100%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
src/dBdt.jl 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
src/simulate.jl 95.23% <87.5%> (+12.73%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 768615b...f2bc48a. Read the comment docs.

@evadelmas evadelmas merged commit c503868 into next Jul 5, 2019
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.6%) to 87.767% when pulling f2bc48a on ADBMtriggering into 768615b on next.

@evadelmas evadelmas deleted the ADBMtriggering branch January 7, 2020 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants