Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exp consistent lifespans #20

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: exp-crccp-replication
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pzirali
Copy link
Collaborator

@pzirali pzirali commented May 21, 2024

I have updated the summary script to create an extra sheet in the summarized.xlsx with select columns. We can use this for now, and add the columns as and when the requirements change.

@pzirali pzirali requested a review from sandypreiss May 21, 2024 20:19
@pzirali pzirali self-assigned this May 21, 2024
@pzirali pzirali marked this pull request as draft May 21, 2024 20:19
Copy link
Collaborator

@sandypreiss sandypreiss left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requesting the merge into exp-crccp-replication is causing a lot of diffs that we don't want. (We want to keep exp-crccp-replication as a record of that specific experiment, not copy exp-consistent-lifespans into it.)

I think the better place to put this change to the summary script is in the experiment-template branch. You can check out experiment-template, branch off of that and make the changes in that branch, then request to merge it into experiment-template.

Comment on lines 130 to 163
# Create a second sheet with select columns
select_columns = ["scenario",
"Colonoscopy_performed_diagnostic_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"Colonoscopy_performed_surveillance_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"FIT_performed_routine_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"clin_crc_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"deadcrc_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"lifeobs_if_unscreened_undiagnosed_at_40_mean",
"discounted_cost_routine_mean",
"discounted_cost_diagnostic_mean",
"discounted_cost_surveillance_mean",
"discounted_cost_treatment_initial_mean",
"discounted_cost_treatment_ongoing_mean",
"discounted_cost_treatment_terminal_mean",
"cost_routine_mean",
"cost_diagnostic_mean",
"cost_surveillance_mean",
"cost_treatment_initial_mean",
"cost_treatment_ongoing_mean",
"cost_treatment_terminal_mean",
"discounted_cost_routine_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"discounted_cost_diagnostic_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"discounted_cost_surveillance_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"discounted_cost_treatment_initial_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"discounted_cost_treatment_ongoing_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"discounted_cost_treatment_terminal_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"cost_routine_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"cost_diagnostic_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"cost_surveillance_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"cost_treatment_initial_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"cost_treatment_ongoing_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"cost_treatment_terminal_per_1k_40yo_mean",
"discounted_lifeobs_if_unscreened_undiagnosed_at_40_mean"]
summary_subset = summary[select_columns]
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was the additional analysis you were doing in excel just selecting a subset of columns? I thought there were some additional calculations involved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants