Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

typechecker: Choose broader type in arrays, sets and dicts #1589

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 21, 2024

Conversation

0GreenClover0
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1353

@0GreenClover0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alternatively we can just always use the type hint id if it exists, I think

@alimpfard alimpfard merged commit c1de5b6 into SerenityOS:main Jul 21, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants